Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QNXT vs IWM

iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

QNXT

iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$17M

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$76.9B

Key differences

  • IWM is significantly larger than QNXT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

QNXTIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$17M$76.9B
Since20242000
Dividend yield0.66%0.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+22.6%+44.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.2%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.78
Volatility 1Y14.97%19.29%
Max drawdown-22.25%-41.13%

Similar to QNXT and IWM