Screener
IWM vs FESM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than FESM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $5.0B |
| Since | 2000 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and FESM
Explore further