Screener
IWM vs IVV
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.16% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than IWM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IVV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $797.5B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -33.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and IVV
Explore further