Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWM vs OEF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$76.9B

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.6B

Key differences

  • IWM is significantly larger than OEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

IWMOEF
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$76.9B$19.6B
Since20002000
Dividend yield0.91%0.88%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.8%+31.9%
CAGR 3Y+18.8%+25.8%
CAGR 5Y+6.5%+15.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.751.31
Volatility 1Y19.22%12.88%
Max drawdown-41.13%-31.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWM and OEF