Screener
IWM vs IYF
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Financials ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IYF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IYF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | IYF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $3.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.9% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.29% | 14.41% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -42.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and IYF
Explore further