Screener
IWM vs IYH
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IYH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | IYH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $2.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 14.63% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and IYH
Explore further