Screener
IWN vs BELT
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.51% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN follows a index tracking strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $9M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and BELT
Explore further