Screener
IWN vs FNDC
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.15% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than FNDC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 14.24% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and FNDC
Explore further