Screener
IWN vs IWR
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than IWN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $52.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and IWR
Explore further