Screener
IWN vs SCHV
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $15.2B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and SCHV
Explore further