Screener
IWO vs FFLG
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both IWO and FFLG are equity ETFs. The main difference: IWO follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- IWO follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last three years, FFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | FFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.7B | — |
| Since | 2000 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.4% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.80% | 18.87% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -44.82% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.