Screener
IWO vs IWB
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IWO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.41% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWO and IWB
Explore further