Screener
IWB vs IWN
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IWN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and IWN
Explore further