Screener
IWO vs IWD
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than IWO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $74.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.33% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWO and IWD
Explore further