Screener
IWP vs ACSG
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- IWP costs 0.26% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWP follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $15M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and ACSG
Explore further