Screener
IWP vs FFLG
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both IWP and FFLG are equity ETFs. The main difference: IWP follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- IWP follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last three years, FFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | FFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20.5B | — |
| Since | 2001 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.72% | 18.87% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -44.82% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.