Screener
IWP vs IWB
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.08% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2001 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and IWB
Explore further