Screener
IWP vs IWO
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, IWO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $13.9B |
| Since | 2001 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 21.33% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -42.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and IWO
Explore further