Screener
IWP vs IWY
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $16.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and IWY
Explore further