Screener
IWR vs IFRA
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than IFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWR | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52.6B | $4.1B |
| Since | 2001 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.2% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.52% | 14.82% |
| Max drawdown | -40.59% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWR and IFRA
Explore further