Screener
IWR vs IWN
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.06% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than IWN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWR | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52.6B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2001 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -40.59% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWR and IWN
Explore further