Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWR vs IWX

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$52.6B

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.4B

Key differences

  • IWR is significantly larger than IWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, IWX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWRIWX
Annual cost (TER)0.18%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$52.6B$3.4B
Since20012009
Dividend yield1.19%1.53%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.8%+29.4%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+18.9%
CAGR 5Y+8.1%+11.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.861.20
Volatility 1Y13.50%10.11%
Max drawdown-40.59%-35.76%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWR and IWX