Screener
IWS vs RFV
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- IWS costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWS | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.9B | $313M |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.31% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -43.83% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWS and RFV
Explore further