Skip to content
Screener

IWV vs AOA

iShares Russell 3000 ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

IWV

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.8B

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

Key differences

IWV is an equity ETF, while AOA is a mixed asset ETF. IWV charges 0.20% a year and AOA 0.15%.

  • IWV is an equity fund, while AOA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AOA costs 0.05% less per year.
  • IWV is much larger than AOA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWVAOA
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$19.8B$3.2B
Since20002008
Dividend yield0.85%2.05%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.5%+21.9%
CAGR 3Y+21.2%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+12.2%+8.9%
Sharpe 3Y1.111.11
Volatility 1Y12.57%11.15%
Max drawdown-35.22%-28.38%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to IWV and AOA