Screener
IWV vs AOR
iShares Russell 3000 ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
IWV is an equity ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. IWV charges 0.20% a year and AOR 0.15%.
- IWV is an equity fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IWV follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- AOR costs 0.05% less per year.
- IWV is much larger than AOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWV | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.8B | $3.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | 2.47% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.57% | 8.85% |
| Max drawdown | -35.22% | -22.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.