Skip to content
Screener

IWV vs AOK

iShares Russell 3000 ETF vs iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

IWV

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.8B

AOK

iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$787M

Key differences

IWV is an equity ETF, while AOK is a mixed asset ETF. IWV charges 0.20% a year and AOK 0.15%.

  • IWV is an equity fund, while AOK is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • IWV follows a index tracking strategy; AOK uses active selection.
  • AOK costs 0.05% less per year.
  • IWV is much larger than AOK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWVAOK
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$19.8B$787M
Since20002008
Dividend yield0.85%3.28%
Asset classequitymixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+24.5%+11.1%
CAGR 3Y+21.2%+9.3%
CAGR 5Y+12.2%+3.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.110.87
Volatility 1Y12.57%5.98%
Max drawdown-35.22%-18.93%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to IWV and AOK