Screener
IWX vs IWB
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.05% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWX | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.11% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -35.76% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWX and IWB
Explore further