Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWX vs IWM

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.4B

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$76.9B

Key differences

  • IWM is significantly larger than IWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWXIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$3.4B$76.9B
Since20092000
Dividend yield1.53%0.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+29.4%+41.8%
CAGR 3Y+18.9%+18.8%
CAGR 5Y+11.1%+6.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.200.75
Volatility 1Y10.11%19.22%
Max drawdown-35.76%-41.13%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWX and IWM