Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWX vs IWR

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.4B

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$52.6B

Key differences

  • IWR is significantly larger than IWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, IWX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWXIWR
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$3.4B$52.6B
Since20092001
Dividend yield1.53%1.19%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+29.4%+21.8%
CAGR 3Y+18.9%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+11.1%+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y1.200.86
Volatility 1Y10.11%13.50%
Max drawdown-35.76%-40.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWX and IWR