Screener
IWY vs HFGO
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.39% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than HFGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY follows a index tracking strategy; HFGO uses active selection.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | HFGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $181M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and HFGO
Explore further