Screener
IWY vs RSSL
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and RSSL
Explore further