Screener
IWY vs TGRW
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.32% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than TGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY follows a index tracking strategy; TGRW uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $972M |
| Since | 2009 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.2% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and TGRW
Explore further