Screener
IXC vs DUG
iShares Global Energy ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.55% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than DUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXC follows a index tracking strategy; DUG uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, IXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | DUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $18M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 5.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | -52.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | -27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.4% | -39.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | -0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.71% | 40.83% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -99.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and DUG
Explore further