Screener
IXC vs MLPA
iShares Global Energy ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.37% less per year.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Since | 2001 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.4% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.71% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and MLPA
Explore further