Screener
IXC vs MLPD
iShares Global Energy ETF vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.20% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXC follows a index tracking strategy; MLPD uses option income.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | MLPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $29M |
| Since | 2001 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 10.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.71% | 7.34% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -12.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and MLPD
Explore further