Screener
IXC vs RSPG
iShares Global Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC is significantly larger than RSPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $624M |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.1% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.7% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.5% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.44% | 21.47% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and RSPG
Explore further