Screener
IXC vs SOLR
iShares Global Energy ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.39% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | SOLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $5M |
| Since | 2001 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.1% | +42.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.7% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.5% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.44% | 19.35% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -39.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and SOLR
Explore further