Screener
SOLR vs IBAT
Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF vs iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
Key differences
- IBAT costs 0.32% less per year.
- IBAT is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| SOLR | IBAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $65M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.0% | +117.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 25.82% |
| Max drawdown | -39.44% | -28.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SOLR and IBAT
Explore further