Screener
IXG vs EFV
iShares Global Financials ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFV costs 0.10% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than IXG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXG | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $30.0B |
| Since | 2001 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.67% | 14.25% |
| Max drawdown | -43.47% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXG and EFV
Explore further