Screener
IXG vs EFA
iShares Global Financials ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.09% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than IXG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXG covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, IXG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXG | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2001 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.69% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -43.47% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXG and EFA
Explore further