Screener
IXG vs RIFR
iShares Global Financials ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IXG costs 0.18% less per year.
- IXG is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXG follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- IXG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXG | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $42M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.69% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -43.47% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXG and RIFR
Explore further