Screener
IXJ vs HEAL
iShares Global Healthcare ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- IXJ costs 0.10% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXJ | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $25M |
| Since | 2001 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.6% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.45% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -27.35% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXJ and HEAL
Explore further