Screener
IXJ vs RIFR
iShares Global Healthcare ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IXJ costs 0.19% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXJ follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXJ | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.6B | $42M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.6% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.45% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -27.35% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXJ and RIFR
Explore further