Screener
IXN vs RIFR
iShares Global Tech ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.20% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $42M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.5% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.62% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and RIFR
Explore further