Screener
RIFR vs RGLO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.10% less per year.
- RGLO is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; RGLO covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $309M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and RGLO
Explore further