Screener
IXP vs GXPC
iShares Global Comm Services ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF
Key differences
- GXPC costs 0.25% less per year.
- IXP is significantly larger than GXPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXP covers global markets; GXPC covers north america.
- IXP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXP | GXPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $599M | $77M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.93% | -16.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXP and GXPC
Explore further