Screener
IXUS vs BAI
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.48% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than BAI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXUS covers global ex us markets; BAI covers global.
- IXUS follows a index tracking strategy; BAI uses active selection.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | BAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +91.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | 32.18% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -34.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and BAI
Explore further