Screener
IXUS vs SCZ
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.33% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than SCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXUS | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56.2B | $14.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | 14.44% |
| Max drawdown | -36.22% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXUS and SCZ
Explore further