Screener
IYF vs IWM
iShares U.S. Financials ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IYF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IYF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYF | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.8% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -42.57% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYF and IWM
Explore further