Screener
IYM vs IWM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYM | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.5% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.63% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -42.76% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYM and IWM
Explore further